- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
-
Managing the "T" in EPSDT Services
The Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program is the child health component of Medicaid. Despite EPSDT’s broad benefits, studies and state policymakers’ experience suggest that not all children are receiving the services to which they are entitled. While many stakeholders understand the requirements that define EPSDT well child visits (commonly called screening visits) and their importance to supporting and promoting child health, the requirements that define EPSDT coverage for treatment (the “T” in EPSDT) are not as well understood. This brief explores states efforts and opportunities to improve access to treatment services in EPSDT.June 2010» -
Enhanced Pregnancy Benefit Packages: Worth Another Look
Through their Medicaid programs, states may offer specialized pregnancy benefits to women that target risks contributing to poor pregnancy outcomes. Though such benefits are categorized as “optional” Medicaid services, they are seen by many as critical to optimizing maternal health and positive birth outcomes. These enhanced pregnancy benefits support women in having healthy pregnancies and contribute to improved infant and maternal health. Congress gave states the option to offer enhanced pregnancy benefits to pregnant women on Medicaid in 1985, and many states quickly took advantage of this opportunity, adding comprehensive non-clinical and medical pregnancy services to their Medicaid benefit packages. The use of enhanced pregnancy benefits peaked in 1993 when forty-four states provided at least one enhanced pregnancy benefit through Medicaid.January 2010 -
Presumptive Eligibility for Pregnant Women
Early prenatal care plays a critical role in the health of pregnant women and their babies. Access to early prenatal care can lead to better birth outcomes, healthier babies, and reduced health care costs. Presumptive eligibility in Medicaid has become an important strategy for improving access to prenatal care for low-income pregnant women. Presumptive eligibility is an option that states can use to allow authorized providers to begin treating pregnant women when they first seek prenatal care rather than several weeks later after a final determination has been made regarding their Medicaid eligibility.December 2008 -
The Role of Physicians in Children’s Oral Health
Dental disease is the most common chronic disease among children in the United States. Although Medicaid entitles children to medically necessary dental care under the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit, many children do not see a dentist until age 3 or later – even though cavity risk factors can be well established before a child’s first birthday and before the first tooth erupts. Untreated dental disease can lead to dietary problems, infection, missed school days, and a lower quality of life.December 2008 -
New Opportunities and Continuing Challenges: A Report from the NASHP EPSDT Forum
Early access to high-quality child health care and development programs builds a foundation that ensures each child the optimum chance to grow strong physically, emotionally, and socially.
July 2008 -
State Health Reform: How Do Dental Benefits Fit In? Options for Policy Makers
This paper discusses the options that states have to include dental benefits in a health care reform plan, if the state desires to do so. Oral health resides, for all intents and purposes, in a different world from general health. Dental care is separate in financing and insurance; provider education, licensing, and regulation; and service delivery. While ambitious health care reform plans have been undertaken in several states and proposed in others, no recent reforms have included dental benefits for the majority of those who are included in the new coverage. The primary barrier for states in including dental coverage is cost – although the traditional separation of general health and oral health – is a factor.April 2008 -
Kansas Health Reform: Options for Adding Dental Benefits
The United States is once again experiencing a steady wave of state health reforms intended to cover more uninsured people, restrain rising costs, improve health outcomes, and redistribute financial burdens. Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont were at the forefront in crafting broad, ambitious reforms and are well along in the implementation process. In many other states, including Kansas, plans are in motion or legislation is being crafted.September 2007 -
SCHIP Dental Benefits
This State Health Policy Monitor examines the status of SCHIP dental benefits in the 39 states that have such benefits in their programs. The paper discusses the variations among states in covered services, cost sharing, and benefit caps.August 2007» -
Improving Patient Safety: What States Can Do About Medical Errors
This briefing paper synthesizes a discussion held among key policy officials in June 2000, at NASHP’s Flood Tide Forum II. The brief examines current federal, congressional, and state activities; proposes roles for states; and identifies actions that foundations and others could take.
Contents
Overview
Background
Patient Safety: How Significant a Problem for States?
What is happening at the Federal level and What Does that Mean for States?
Discussion
Next StepsCreate NASHP Publication | National Academy for State Health Policy Production SiteSeptember 2000»
