- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Case Management
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- Emergency Care
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Hospitals
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
States, through the Medicaid program, are major purchasers of long-term care. Financed by the federal and state governments and administered by the states, Medicaid pays for over 40 percent of long-term care services nationwide. At the same time, long-term care for the elderly and persons with disabilities is the largest single component of Medicaid, averaging 35 percent (or $76 billion) of the program’s total budget. Soaring health costs combined with plunging state revenues have forced states to take a number of actions to control the growth of Medicaid. And as our nation ages and the demand for long-term care services continues to grow, long-term care programs are facing increasingly close scrutiny at both the federal and state levels.
In an effort to review Medicaid’s long-term care program and identify its goals, strengths, and weaknesses, the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP), with support from the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, convened a forum of officials from seven states (Idaho, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Washington, and Wisconsin). The group met July 15, 2003, in Washington, D.C., and was comprised of a cross-section of state officials that included governors’ policy staff, state budget officials, department directors, and program administrators. In addition, we have sought input from several other state officials who were unable to attend the meeting.
This report summarizes the group’s discussions as well as follow-up deliberations. It first focuses on the current environment that states face, addressing such issues as Medicaid’s role in long-term care, state fiscal crises and cost-containment strategies, and how state long-term care programs are evolving. It then details seven goals identified by the states participating in the forum. Those goals include 1) expanding access to home and community-based services; 2) reducing institutional bias; 3) allowing for greater consumer choice of services and settings; 4) expanding eligibility for long-term care; 5) improving coordination of care; 6) stabilizing financing; and 7) improving the capacity for strategic planning and tools development.
Additional resources are included and referenced where useful.
January 2004
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| State Perspectives on Medicaid Long-Term Care | 234.83 KB |
