- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
Chronic care is driving the cost of the Medicaid program, and the future of insurance coverage for low-income families and children depends upon success in meeting the needs of those with chronic conditions at a cost society can afford. This paper tallies the suggestions made by a group of informants who have given substantial thought to how Medicaid can achieve this goal.
National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) staff conducted 28 one-hour semi-structured telephone interviews with key informants representing state agencies, researchers, providers, and consumers during August, September, and October 2006. Informants were asked to describe innovations in Medicaid policy that would improve services to high-cost Medicaid beneficiaries and/or improve the cost effectiveness of the Medicaid program. They were also asked to describe the most effective levers for improving efficiency and quality and innovations that have been successful.
This paper is organized around four major categories of responses:
1) remove the institutional bias in Medicaid;
2) improve coordination of care for dual eligibles;
3) improve chronic care management; and
4) reduce demand for the Medicaid program.
January 2007
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| High Cost Medicaid Beneficiaries | 452.58 KB |
»
