- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
Submitted by Admin on Tue, 06/22/2010 - 12:45
The insurance exchange will be the exclusive vehicle for individuals and families to obtain subsidized insurance coverage, and it may also become a place where many individuals and firms purchase coverage without subsidies. As such, the insurance exchange presents each state with the opportunity to organize the chaotic and inefficient small group and individual insurance markets. A better-functioning market can improve choice and value for individuals, families, and small businesses, all of which are struggling to afford health insurance. States have many choices with respect to the exchange. They may create separate exchanges for individuals and small businesses, or they may combine the two. They may create a statewide exchange, subdivide the state regionally, or join together with other states.
States also may elect not to create an exchange at all, in which case the federal government will carry out these functions. Any one of these may be a reasonable choice for a state depending upon its own capacity and the nature of the insurance market. Beyond the number and size of the exchange( s ) , states must make choices about exchange governance, including whether the exchange is inside or outside state government, and, if inside, whether it resides in an existing agency, a new agency, or has an independent status.
Structural choices regarding the exchange will affect the state’s ability to integrate the exchange into its overall implementation strategy. Critical exchange functions include selection of participating health plans and review of their rates, standardized presentation of information on benefits so people can make informed choices, standardized data collection across plans, holding plans to high standards in providing access to services and achieving health outcomes, and an effective risk adjustment mechanism to avoid incentives for risk selection and to assure that plans have sufficient resources to provide services to enrollees with high health needs. How the state approaches these functions—in particular how active or aggressive a role it plays in defining health insurance options within the exchange—will have a significant effect on the ultimate shape of the health insurance marketplace. An effective exchange will be a force for efficiency and an orientation toward quality in the insurance and health delivery sectors.
