- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
Submitted by Admin on Thu, 06/17/2010 - 14:33
The public remains confused about how health reform will affect them. The large number of people eligible for Medicaid and CHIP but not enrolled demonstrates that simply creating opportunities for coverage does not mean people will take advantage of them. Fundamentally, health reform can only succeed if it is more about culture and norms than it is about mandates and penalties.
The public also includes the large health sector and employers, who will also face significant changes. The most successful efforts to improve the performance of the health system have been multi-sector, public and private initiatives that set goals and plans for concrete improvements. This framework is particularly essential when pursuing payment changes, which can only have their intended effect if they are adopted across purchasers.
The sheer number and scale of the tasks to be accomplished means the resources of each state’s people and institutions must be brought into the implementation discussion. No amount of talent and goodwill in the state capitol can develop answers and policies that work for an entire state.
States must develop a clear approach to achieving effective information flow between an engaged public and their elected representatives to weigh in on options before one is chosen, and to provide information back on how things are going so they can be improved.
