- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
Submitted by Admin on Thu, 06/17/2010 - 14:24
Data is the engine of improvement. The American health care system stands out relative to other sectors of the economy and relative to the health systems of other nations as operating with limited data. Its roots are paper medical records, payment methods that are treated as trade secrets, and fragmented delivery systems and payers, each of which owns its own data.
There are myriad provisions in the health reform law that call for the collection of new data. Data elements include race, ethnicity and language, price and utilization, program enrollment, and quality metrics. New data will be collected on, among other things, consumer complaints, wellness programs, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the health care workforce.
Effective use of data requires a commitment to collect it, a strategy to combine data that come from different sources, and selection of priority areas for analysis. Under the provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, each state has already developed health information exchange strategic and operational plans. These plans should be updated to reflect the new data provisions and to refine the approach to placing appropriate subsets of the data in the public domain where it can become a force for improvement. Purchasers—individuals, employers, public purchasers and the exchange—can use data to drive improvement in outcomes and quality. Doctors, hospitals, and health systems can use data to achieve the same ends. The state can aggregate data across systems to monitor population health, identify priorities for improvement, and track progress toward improvement goals.
