- ACA Implementation & State Health Reform
- Coverage and Access
- Federal/State Issues
- Medicaid and CHIP
- Population and Public Health
- Providers and Services
- Acute Care
- Assisted Living
- Behavioral Health
- Case Management
- Child Development Services
- Chronic Care Management
- Community Health Centers
- Developmental Screening
- Early Childhood Services
- Emergency Care
- EPSDT
- Family Planning
- Federally Qualified Health Centers
- Home & Community Based Services
- Hospitals
- Long Term Services & Supports
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Mental Health
- Nursing Homes
- Oral Health
- Preventive Care
- Primary Care
- Safety Net Providers
- Quality, Cost, and Health System Performance
- ACOs
- Adverse Event Reporting
- Care Transitions
- Comparative Effectiveness
- Cost Sharing
- Delivery System Reform
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Workforce
- Health Information Technology
- Managed Care
- Medical Homes & Health Homes
- Medical Malpractice
- Patient Safety
- Payment Reform
- Performance Measurement
- Provider Payment Policy
- Quality Oversight
- Specific Populations
- Adolescents
- Childless Adults
- Children
- Children with Special Health Care Needs
- Dual Eligibles
- Elders
- Families
- Low Income People
- Parents
- People with Chronic Conditions
- People with Developmental Disabilities
- Transitional Youth
- Vulnerable Populations
- Young Adults
- Youth
- Youth in Foster Care System
- Youth in Juvenile Justice System
Submitted by Admin on Tue, 06/22/2010 - 10:24
The federal law creates many new standards for health insurance underwriting and rating practices. Primary responsibility for enforcing most of those standards falls to the states. While insurance regulation is not a new state function, most states will be expected to dramatically increase their scrutiny of insurance rates and rate increases. Insurance regulation requires a significant number of resources, including highly technical skills. It also requires a range of enforcement tools. Effective regulation is essential to assure availability of affordable coverage, to avoid risk selection between the exchange and the external market, and to focus the health insurance industry on delivery system improvements.
The transition to new rating rules for small group and individual insurance must be handled carefully, as the existing market is fragile and subject to instability, and the amount of change in this market that will occur over a short period involves significant uncertainty. States will also have a significant new role regarding review of health insurance premium increases. States must scrutinize rating and marketing practices carefully inside and outside the exchange. States must monitor the status of grandfathered plans to assure that they do not become an opportunity for risk selection or risk segmentation.
