Home

Identifying Children and Families at Risk

 
Early identification is essential for three reasons. First, in terms of brain development, quality early relationships and experiences can positively affect gene function, neural connections, and the organization of the mind, having lifelong positive effects.* Second, once established, social and emotional problems are highly resistant to change.** It is not surprising that a strong relationship exists between childhood social and emotional problems, delinquency, and later criminality.*** Third, the costs associated with antisocial and criminal behavior are staggering. Targeted interventions may improve outcomes and save subsequent social costs, such as those incurred in juvenile justice programs.****

To improve the accuracy and efficiency of developmental surveillance, it is important to use formal screening measures in addition to observation and interview. Screening tests also need to be repeated over time to improve the effectiveness of the screening process. Having parents complete a simple questionnaire may improve the accuracy of the screening process while empowering them and conserving valuable professional resources. Parents may provide information that they would not otherwise share and may provide more complete information with a small investment of professional time.
 
To date, 27 ABCD states have engaged in efforts to improve the performance of health care practices through the adoption of structured developmental screening of young children.  A short list of tools the ABCD states recommended/required includes: 
 
Developmental screening:
Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ)
Ages and Stages Questionnaire – Social Emotional (ASQ-SE)
Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS)
Pediatric Symptom Checklist
 
Perinatal depression screening:
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
 

This section includes resources that summarize current guidelines and recommendations and that offer suggestions for improving developmental and behavioral health services for young children.  It will include suggestions for identifying and selecting screening tools.  It will also provide information on engaging and working with primary care practices to implement developmental screening, including establishing learning collaboratives of practice-based teams, developing training modules for individual pilots and practices, identifying “provder champions” to serve as mentors to primary care providers, and partnering with provider organizations that provide direct support to practices.

Sources:
*Shonkoff J, Phillips D (eds): From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 2000

**Walker HM, Sprague JR: The path to school failure, delinquency, and violence: Causal factors and some potential solutions. Intervention in School and Clinic 2000;35(2):67

***Dishion T, French D, Patterson G: The development and ecology of antisocial behavior, in Cicchetti D, Cohen D (eds): Developmental Psychopathology, Vol. 2: Risk, Disorder, and Adaptation. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1995, pp 388–394

****Wildman B, Kizilbush A, Smucker W: Physicians' attention to parents' concerns about the psychosocial functioning of their children. Arch Fam Med 1999;8(5):440

 

Title Description Date publishedsort icon Resource State
State Strategies that Support Effective Identification of Children At-Risk for Developmental Delay

In 2007, 19 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia came together to form the Assuring Better Child Health and Development (ABCD) Screening Academy. They worked, with the support of NASHP, to improve identification of children with or at risk for or with developmental delays.

March 2009 NASHP-Commonwealth
Pediatric Clinicians Guide: Steps to Parental Depression Screening

Utah ABCD Project (2006) This flowchart describes steps for clinicians to use during Parental Depression Screening.

January 2009 State-specific Utah
Maryland's Screening Tool Selection Criteria

Maryland ABCD Project (2008) Criteria agreed upon by the Maryland Screening Tool Selection Committee for the purpose of choosing a list of approved tools for general developmental screening for use in the Maryland Healthy Kids Program (EPSDT). This resource also lists tools selected for review based on those criteria.

December 2008 State-specific Maryland
Comparative Information on Other Developmental Screening Tools

California ABCD Screening Academy Project (2008). Table of comparative information on additional screening tools for: social & emotional issues, autism, language and cognitive skills, motor skills, and specialized screening tools covering multiple but not all developmental domains.

December 2008 State-specific California
Comparative Information on ASQ, PEDS and PEDS:DM

Margaret Dunkle (2008). The California ABCD Screening Academy Project developed this table of comparative information on ASQ, PEDS and PEDS:DM, including a description of the tool, developmental domains covered, accuracy, age range, administration time, scoring, psychometric properties, available languages and reading level, costs, and purchasing and additional information.

December 2008 State-specific California
Developmental Screening Tools: Choices for Practices and Providers

Margaret Dunkle (August 2008). California developed a table designed to help select high-quality and practical tools to screen children from birth to 8 years of age for developmental delays or disabilities. All tools listed have at least 70% accuracy – that is, sensitivity and specificity, correctly identifying at least 70% of children with and without disabilities, delays or problems.
 

December 2008 State-specific Colorado
Pediatric Developmental Screening: Understanding and Selecting Screening Instruments

Dennis Drotar, Ph.D., Terry Stancin, Ph.D., and Paul Dworkin, M.D. (2008). This manual helps providers choose and apply the structured screening method that is most appropriate for their practice setting. The manual is based on an extensive review of scientific research on available developmental screening instruments. Part I of the manual is designed to help practitioners define their screening needs. Part II includes a series of guides that compare screening instruments with respect to clinical utility, and sensitivity and specificity in different populations and at various ages.

December 2008 NASHP-Commonwealth
Protocol for the Administration of ASQ Questionnaire in Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico ABCD Project (2007) A Comprehensive Guide for using the ASQ Questionnaire in the demonstration Sites participating in the Puerto Rico ABCD “Creciendo Juntos” Project
 

December 2007 State-specific Puerto Rico
Screening Tool Guidelines For Primary Care Pediatric Providers, November, 2007

Oregon ABCD Project (2007) The Steering Committee of Oregon Assuring Better Child Development (ABCD) Early Childhood Screening Initiative reviewed the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement and created guidelines to help implement standardized developmental, behavioral and psychosocial screening in a primary care setting.

December 2007 State-specific Oregon
Developmental and Social-Emotional Screening of Young Children in Minnesota

Minnesota Department of Health (2007) The Minnesota Developmental Screening Task Force developed criteria for selecting standardized developmental screening tools in primary care practices. This is a link to the description of the criteria the task force developed.

 

 

December 2007 State-specific Minnesota